<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Phinney on Fonts &#187; font</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thomasphinney.com/tag/font/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thomasphinney.com</link>
	<description>the Phinney-us Blog on Typography &#38; Text</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 22:02:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A font by any other name?</title>
		<link>http://www.thomasphinney.com/2009/02/font-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thomasphinney.com/2009/02/font-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Phinney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Terminology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[font]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typeface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomasphinney.com/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[UPDATE 5 Mar 2009: Survey is now closed. I am analyzing and writing up the results.] I&#8217;ve noticed over the years that there isn&#8217;t a perfect consensus on the use of certain terms, such as “font” and “typeface.” I am of the opinion that there is a strong majority usage, and historical precedent, but I’m [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[UPDATE 5 Mar 2009: Survey is now closed. I am analyzing and writing up the results.]</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed over the years that there isn&#8217;t a perfect consensus on the use of certain terms, such as “font” and “typeface.” I am of the opinion that there is a strong majority usage, and historical precedent, but I’m curious to understand better current usage, and how it differs by degree of font expertise (a.k.a “geekiness”) and/or geographic location.<BR><BR></p>
<p>Please <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=CmWLXXTwup3skzck6j09Bw_3d_3d">take my survey</a>. I’ll let it run until I feel like I’ve got enough responses, then I’ll post the results and my analysis.<BR><BR></p>
<p>I’m eager to learn more. Is there a gap between expert usage and the average user? Maybe we’ll discover that I&#8217;m just a stick in the mud regarding terms that have mutated over time&#8230; or maybe I’ll get ammunition to defend the Wikipedia definitions from the clueless, and persuade type foundries to standardize their langauge. Stay tuned!<BR><BR></p>
<p>SPOILER ALERT! Please don&#8217;t read the comments below until <strong>after</strong> you&#8217;ve done the survey! There are definitely some&#8230; well, not spoilers, but potential influencers and links to other pieces on the subject. Thanks!</p>
<p>[UPDATE: <a href="http://www.thomasphinney.com/2009/04/font-terms-survey-results/">Survey results are here</a>.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thomasphinney.com/2009/02/font-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
