<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lifting the veil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thomasphinney.com/2009/08/lifting-the-veil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thomasphinney.com/2009/08/lifting-the-veil/</link>
	<description>the Phinney-us Blog on Typography &#38; Text</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:32:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Fink</title>
		<link>http://www.thomasphinney.com/2009/08/lifting-the-veil/comment-page-1/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomasphinney.com/?p=412#comment-944</guid>
		<description>&gt;But the price is pretty clear in various places now.

What happened was when I went to &quot;Buy&quot;, it asked me for the country I lived in as a single-entry form on it&#039;s own page.
The web being what it is and users picking up habits from what gets done on other sites, this led me to believe that I was going to be quizzed - getting my email, registering, who knows what - before even being able to see the price.
(This kind of &quot;at least get them on a mailing list&quot; UI happens a lot.) I had other things to do and clicked off.
When I went back. Once I got past that &quot;what country are you in&quot; page, there was no rigmarole as I had feared/anticipated.
You might want to tell the web site guys to integrate that page into the main form and just assume a default of USA or whatever. That&#039;s 4 cents now.

rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;But the price is pretty clear in various places now.</p>
<p>What happened was when I went to &#8220;Buy&#8221;, it asked me for the country I lived in as a single-entry form on it&#8217;s own page.<br />
The web being what it is and users picking up habits from what gets done on other sites, this led me to believe that I was going to be quizzed &#8211; getting my email, registering, who knows what &#8211; before even being able to see the price.<br />
(This kind of &#8220;at least get them on a mailing list&#8221; UI happens a lot.) I had other things to do and clicked off.<br />
When I went back. Once I got past that &#8220;what country are you in&#8221; page, there was no rigmarole as I had feared/anticipated.<br />
You might want to tell the web site guys to integrate that page into the main form and just assume a default of USA or whatever. That&#8217;s 4 cents now.</p>
<p>rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rowley</title>
		<link>http://www.thomasphinney.com/2009/08/lifting-the-veil/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomasphinney.com/?p=412#comment-936</guid>
		<description>&#039;Expected street price is under $100 for the full version and under $50 for the upgrade&#039;

That&#039;s what I expected when I went to order the upgrade, but the price went up to $65, a 30% increase. I realize you&#039;re not a marketing man, but why the difference?

&lt;em&gt;[I gather that would be the &quot;international&quot; price instead of the US price. - T]&lt;/em&gt;

I like the product, if it does what it says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Expected street price is under $100 for the full version and under $50 for the upgrade&#8217;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I expected when I went to order the upgrade, but the price went up to $65, a 30% increase. I realize you&#8217;re not a marketing man, but why the difference?</p>
<p><em>[I gather that would be the "international" price instead of the US price. - T]</em></p>
<p>I like the product, if it does what it says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Fink</title>
		<link>http://www.thomasphinney.com/2009/08/lifting-the-veil/comment-page-1/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomasphinney.com/?p=412#comment-934</guid>
		<description>Thomas,

I&#039;ve been using a competitor&#039;s font-management product for some time. (Windows) On features, Suitcase looks like it blows it away. You might want to consider a price for upgrading from your competitor&#039;s product(s), as well. Might be smart business.

&lt;em&gt;[Glad you like what you see. A bunch of people worked very hard to make it so. I&#039;ll pass on your competitive upgrade suggestion, though of course verifying ownership could be difficult. - T]&lt;/em&gt;

I&#039;ve got one beef - the Extensis site is a little too cute about the price. The upgrade price is easy to find and featured (&quot;starts at $...&quot;) but what am I in for as a new user? Looks like I&#039;ve got go through a rigmarole to find that out.

&lt;em&gt;[Well, like I said, the actual announcement wasn&#039;t up yet, and a few other pieces were still to come as it was breaking news. But the price is pretty clear in various places now. Expected street price is under $100 for the full version and under $50 for the upgrade. - T]&lt;/em&gt;

With the onset of @font-face (makes it sound like a disease, right?), I suspect that a lot of people are going to become more font-aware and need utilities like this to dynamically install and reinstall fonts as they test web pages. It&#039;s very easy to get tripped up when you&#039;ve got the same font you&#039;re calling with a link from your web page installed on your machine. At least I&#039;ve found it tricky. It&#039;s too easy to get a false result.
Also, in connection with web fonts, I&#039;m planning on doing a side-by-side roundup of products like in the near future on &lt;a href=&quot;http://readableweb.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Readable Web&lt;/a&gt;.

That&#039;s my 2 cents for today. The product looks great.

Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using a competitor&#8217;s font-management product for some time. (Windows) On features, Suitcase looks like it blows it away. You might want to consider a price for upgrading from your competitor&#8217;s product(s), as well. Might be smart business.</p>
<p><em>[Glad you like what you see. A bunch of people worked very hard to make it so. I'll pass on your competitive upgrade suggestion, though of course verifying ownership could be difficult. - T]</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got one beef &#8211; the Extensis site is a little too cute about the price. The upgrade price is easy to find and featured (&#8220;starts at $&#8230;&#8221;) but what am I in for as a new user? Looks like I&#8217;ve got go through a rigmarole to find that out.</p>
<p><em>[Well, like I said, the actual announcement wasn't up yet, and a few other pieces were still to come as it was breaking news. But the price is pretty clear in various places now. Expected street price is under $100 for the full version and under $50 for the upgrade. - T]</em></p>
<p>With the onset of @font-face (makes it sound like a disease, right?), I suspect that a lot of people are going to become more font-aware and need utilities like this to dynamically install and reinstall fonts as they test web pages. It&#8217;s very easy to get tripped up when you&#8217;ve got the same font you&#8217;re calling with a link from your web page installed on your machine. At least I&#8217;ve found it tricky. It&#8217;s too easy to get a false result.<br />
Also, in connection with web fonts, I&#8217;m planning on doing a side-by-side roundup of products like in the near future on <a href="http://readableweb.com" rel="nofollow">Readable Web</a>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my 2 cents for today. The product looks great.</p>
<p>Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
